|
Global Militarism and the Environment
Jim Hollingsworth
On August 6, 1945, a solitary American B-29 bomber dropped an atomic
bomb on Hiroshima, devastating the city and killing 200,000 people.
Three days later, a similar bomb devastated Nagasaki. On the 45th
anniversary of this tragic and pivotal event in the history of humankind,
it is salutary to assess the continuing human and ecological toll
demanded by world militarism.
In 1989, world military expenditures were more than $1 trillion.
In the Third World, governments now spend approximately half their
total budgets on the military and on servicing their national debt.
With such huge demands on national budgets, humane programs for
health, nutrition, housing, education, social services, and environmental
protection are grossly underfunded.
Many of the world's worst environmental crises are in war-torn,
Third World countries, but environmental problems there cannot be
dealt with until the wars are over. "Stopping the wars has
to be the first step in any rebuilding of the environment,'' says
Peter Tessier, an agronomist with the United Nations.
If our planet is to be healed, the connection between militarism
and environmental decay has to be recognized and steps taken to
reduce military spending. U.S. researcher and writer Ruth Leger
Sivard gives an example of how a five per cent cut in the global
military budget would provide $5 billion for humanitarian and environmental
needs. Such a sum of money could fund a cleanup of nuclear bomb
plants; promote safe water, sanitation and supplementary food for
the half of the world that desperately needs all three; provide
material health care and education to all who need it; establish
community health posts for the billion people in the world who have
no primary health care; and build a worldwide satellite-based network
for health education.
All this could be achieved with only a five per cent cut. With
a ten per cent cut, we could reverse desertification, prevent the
erosion of topsoil and develop alternative forms of energy.
Canadians often consider Canada to be a bit player in militarism,
but an important protector of the environment. The figures tell
a different story, however. This year Ottawa will spend 12.3 times
more on the Department of National Defence than on the Department
of the Environment.
Canada spends more on its military than the entire continent of
South America does. At our current annual military budget of $12
billion we spend twice as much on the military as the entire African
continent spends on health care.
In addition, in 1990 alone, Canada will spend 9.1 times as much
on low-level air defence systems for our troops in Europe as we
will contribute to the United Nations, and 4.2 times as much on
defence as on foreign aid.
Canada is also an active participant in the international military
market. Every second year Canada plays host to ARMX, one of the
world's most popular military trade fairs. At ARMX, which is held
in Ottawa, Canadian manufacturers promote and sell their products,
which sometimes appear in the armouries of countries that have an
atrocious history of violating human rights.
Canada exports approximately $2 billion worth of military merchandise
each year. Some of this is purchased by Third World governments,
which chose to buy military products rather than provide health
care, nutrition and shelter for their people.
Furthermore, Third World countries often viciously exploit their
natural resources in order to pay for their imported military equipment
and to service their international debt.
Through its participation in the United Nations peace-keeping forces,
Canada has done much excellent work in helping to solve disputes
all over the world. It is to be hoped that this tradition sill continue.
Project Ploughshares, an ecumenical Canadian peace organization,
is calling for a 50% reduction in Canada's military spending. There
is strong evidence that on such a reduced budget we would still
be able to defend our country and fulfil our obligations to the
United Nations. As we remember the horrors of Hiroshima and Nagasaki,
let us hope that our government hears and heeds the call.
Jim Hollingsworth is a member of Canadian Physicians for the Prevention
of Nuclear War.
From Links, February 1991, Vol. 3, No. 2, p. 2
(Reprinted with permission from Probe Post, Canada's Environmental
Magazine)
(CX5099)
Subject Headings
Environment
Militarism
Peace
Connexions
Links - Connexions
Directory A-Z Index - Connexions
Library
Periodicals
& Broadcasters Online - Volunteer
Opportunities - Publicity
& media relations resources
Connexions
Phone: 416-964-1511
E-mail:
www.connexions.org
|