| Canada's
Water: Resource War #2?
The Oil War in the Persian Gulf has been a great set-back for all
those who fondly hoped for real change a “Peace Dividend”
following the end of the Cold War. The opportunity was there to
direct effort toward transforming military resources to work for
genuine peace and a sustainable future but, instead, the United
States chose the predictable role of the world’s bully and
policeman. There is every reason why those of us north of the 49th
parallel should be acutely concerned.
For the Persian Gulf war is most likely only the first of the turn-of-the-century
Resource Wars that will be fought ostensibly by the most powerful
nation states, but will be for the benefit of the transnational
corporations which now wield the truly significant power in the
modern geopolitical arena. If the U.S. was prepared to go to war
in the Middle East mainly to exert control over oil not really needing
that oil for itself one might well ask to what extent the U.S. will
be prepared to exert its muscle over a commodity such as water which
it needs?
As this issue points out (Ed: see above), American interests are
eyeing Canadian water whether for power, irrigation or for drinking
in an alarming way. Worse, Canadian policy seems to be one of active
complicity in giving away such resources, as James Bay, the Rafferty-Alameda
project and the move to export B.C.’s water all demonstrate.
Canada’s sycophantic support for the Gulf war, the seemingly
inexorable advance of “free” trade, and the machinations
of the B.C. government in its on-going war against nature in the
Georgia Gulf and elsewhere in the province, all point toward further
complicity as though we were surrendering, before the Water War
and Forests War had even been officially announced.
Especially worrisome are the insidious ways by which even opposition
groups are being seduced by the largesse of the corporations. When
the Sierra Club, the Audubon Society and the National Wildlife Federation
in the U.S. are funded by the likes of British Petroleum, Chevron,
Exxon, IBM, General Electric, Dupont, Pepsi, Coke, Monsanto and
Waste Management Inc., ... then there is something seriously wrong.
Co-option at all levels is the corporate strategy. Clearly, we need
to bye super-vigilant to avoid being bought off.
Politically, we need strong and active grassroots coalitions and
alliances which are emerging here and there, as this issue reports.
Economically, we absolutely must retain our independence among the
alternative media especially. And, among friends, we need to communicate
and strategize more deeply and effectively together. In the face
of a consolidation of “New World” power on a scale never
previously imagined, our cohesion and ability to get along become
crucial. We may be all we have.
From The New Catalyst, Spring 1991, No. 20. Reprinted
from the Vancouver Sun, Mar. 16 and 23, 1991
The New Catalyst is published quarterly by the Catalyst Education
Society, P.O Box 189, Gabriola Island, BC V0R 1X0, Tel (604) 247-9737
(CX5086)
See also:
Water
Exports: The New "Gold Rush?" - With global
warming a reality, the shortage of water
has become an top issue in the U.S., and it appears the nation will
look north of the border for help. In Canada, opposition is growing.
(CX5085).
Subject Headings
Water
Exports
Connexions
Links - Connexions
Directory A-Z Index - Connexions
Library
Periodicals
& Broadcasters Online - Volunteer
Opportunities - Publicity
& media relations resources
Connexions
Phone: 416-964-1511
E-mail:
www.connexions.org
|