|
Slamming the World Bank and the
IMF
Robert Wiseman
Over 170 activists in non-governmental organizations (NGO's) from
53 countries and six continents came together in late September
in Washington, D.C., to denounce the policies of the World Bank
and the International Monetary Fund (IMF). Meeting concurrently
with the World Bank/IMF annual meetings, the People's Network for
Eco Development sharply criticized the social and environmental
impacts of Bank and IMF programs and mapped out strategies to counter
the Bank and IMF's agenda.
Activists blasted the Bank and the Fund's structural adjustment
policies, which force governments to cut back social programs, devalue
currencies and privatize state-owned enterprises, for devastating
Third World economies and exacerbating the suffering of the poor.
“Everywhere on the ground, people are saying (to the Bank
and IMF), 'take your money back home,”” said Vandana
Shiva of the Research Institute for Natural Resource Policy in India.
Future historians will “record that the Bank cares about nothing
beyond increasing its own power,” stated Shiva. “The
Bank cares nothing about whether people live or die.”
Joan French of the Caribbean Association for Feminist Research
and Action focused on the effect of structural adjustment policies
on women. “Women are central to World Bank and IMF policies,”
she said. When schools and hospitals are closed an a result of structural
adjustment policies, “It is women who take up the slack ...
(The Bank and IMF) depend on the unpaid labour of women.”
Leonar Briones of the Philippines Freedom From Debt Coalition explained
how the privatization of government enterprises, promoted by the
Bank and Fund, furthers foreign dominance in Third World countries.
With the World Bank's agreement, she said, the Philippines is supposed
to complete the privatization of government entities in five years.
But, she asked, “who (dominates) the private sector in the
Philippines?” The answer: “Foreign interests. So privatization
(leads to) the entrenchment of elites and the expansion of foreign
control.”
The activists also targeted the projects funded by the World Bank,
which have had disastrous effects on the environment and entire
communities. Environmentalists focused on the Sardar Sarovar Project,
a dam project on India's Narmada River, as an example of the effects
of World Bank sponsored development ventures. The Sardar Sarovar
Project, just one part of a larger effort in the Narmada Valley,
will force the relocation of approximately 100,000 people and submerge
vast tracts of fertile farmland and forests.
While the NGO's from the industrialized countries and the Third
World offered similar analyses of the problems with Bank and Fund
policies, some tension arose between the Northern and Southern NGO's.
On the second day of the three day conference, Third World participants
met by themselves to discuss their experience and strategies to
combat the Bank and the IMF.
Third World activists charged that many Northern environmentalists
ignore the fact that people are hurt by the World Bank, the IMF
and the international debt crisis. “It is not only the environment
which pays for debt, it is people, “ stated Briones.
Northern environmental NGO's have “a tendency to discuss
the environment in terms of 'natural resource management,”'
said Uganda's Charles Abugre, and thus ignore the international
interests of the people who live in the environment they want to
protect. Harry Sakulas of the Way Ecology Institute in Papua New
Guinea identified Conservation International and the World Wildlife
Fund as two groups guilty of adopting a resource management approach.
He said they have worked with the much criticized World-Bank-sponsored
Tropical Forest Action Plan to develop a forestry management plan
for Papua New Guinea without consultation with Papua New Guineans.
Many participants found the airing of such grievances constructive.
Doug Hellinger of the Development Group for Alternative Priorities
said that “groups in the South helped groups in the North
see that the economic policies being pushed by the (IMF and World
Bank) are the underlying causes of social demise and environmental
degradation.”
Hellinger says the NGO campaign against the policies of the World
Bank and IMF “is much more comprehensive and sophisticated”
than it was a few years ago, and he expects that “over time
a more coordinated and aggressive campaign will emerge to not only
push these institutions, but to put forward an alternative (development
model) emerging from the ground” in Third World countries.
From One Sky Report for March 1991.
(CX5079)
See also:
Structural
Adjustment -
The economics of structural adjustment in Canada. (CX5080).
Subject Headings
Environment/Developing
Countries
Environment/International
Environmental
Economics
Environmental
Impacts
International
Monetary Fund (IMF)
Privatization
Social
Impact Assessment
Structural
Adjustment
World
Bank
Connexions
Links - Connexions
Directory A-Z Index - Connexions
Library
Periodicals
& Broadcasters Online - Volunteer
Opportunities - Publicity
& media relations resources
Connexions
Phone: 416-964-1511
E-mail:
www.connexions.org
|