www.newsandletters.org












NEWS & LETTERS, March-April 2005

Workshop Talks

French workers defend 35-hour week

by Htun Lin

As a gesture of reconciliation after their public dispute over the war in Iraq, George W. Bush shared an order of French fries with Jacques Chirac, France’s president, during Bush’s visit to Europe. But the presidents of both countries are in lockstep about one thing: shoving the bill for a precarious economy down workers’ throats.

Emulating U.S. efforts to increase productivity, the French president got a parliamentary majority to eliminate France’s 35-hour workweek rule. No less than 100 protest demonstrations erupted across France.

Herve Gaymard, the young, recently appointed finance minister, broke a taboo last week by noting in a radio broadcast that France had the lowest employment level of working-age people of any major nation. "How can you compete like that?" he asked.

Banque de France governor Christian Noyer put the problem more bluntly: "We will not beat the competition by working less and opposing the reforms that promote growth." Apparently he presumes that forcing workers to work extended hours will lower unemployment, not increase it.

This is the kind of sophistry we American workers have been hearing during the last decade of restructuring. Rampant overtime and speed-up fed a wildly successful increase in productivity, accompanied by an "unexpected" jobless boom.

Christian Noyer elaborated further, "What really worries me is the difficulty that we in France have in understanding the way the world works and how to win in the world."

The "way of the world" indeed. It is a world of an unfettered sweatshop global economy spearheaded by the near slavery labor practices of ruthless emerging superpower developers like China. It invaded the world economy with its relentless drive to lower labor costs primarily through low wages with missionary zeal unrivaled even by the American president’s mission to "spread democracy."

PITTING WORKER AGAINST WORKER

Hundreds of millions of workers, not only Chinese workers but workers all over the globe from India to Thailand, from Germany to the U.S., must adapt to the "way of the world" if they are to survive the competition.

France is getting ready to do what in Germany is already well on its way--massive restructuring of their economy, emulating the attacks launched against labor already practiced in the U. S. First there was welfare reform and now Social Security "reform." There are new overtime rules and health care cost-shifting.

 The latest attack from Gov. Schwarzenegger of California, having successfully increased patient workload for each nurse, is to increase the number of hours worked before a worker is entitled to a lunch break. In my own shop, healthcare workers routinely work 10-hour to 12-hour workdays, sometimes 16. All this is in the name of "freedom," which the Bush regime equates with "free trade."

The American and the French governments are shoulder to shoulder when it comes to the need to attack workers’ gains. Here lies the truly irreconcilable conflict--the one between labor and capital.

Prime Minister Raffarin insisted that big protest marches throughout France would not divert his drive to undo the compulsory maximum 35-hour week, the measure that was the prime legacy of the previous socialist government. This echoed eerily President Bush’s attitude towards global outrage against his invasion of Iraq, which hundreds of millions protested worldwide.

FREEDOM TO EXPLOIT

The new legislation in France allows people to work up to 48 hours a week if they and their employers agree--precisely the rationale being employed by the Bush true believers like Gov. Schwarzenegger with his own new workday and workweek rules.

The weapon of mass deception is the mantra, "the freedom to earn more," employed this time to attack the gains of labor’s past struggles--the normal workweek in France. In reality, with the new work rules, the French employers will be able to force longer hours for the same pay.

What kind of "democracy" do we have when we are all "free to choose," but all options offered to us workers represent our own demise? Choose as we may, individually as workers, in the present scheme of things, we really have no choice, in the irresistible self-expansion of capital, and its relentless drive to dominate all aspects of our lives.

One thing is certain--until society transcends capitalism and its alienated mode of production, what Marx said in CAPITAL will remain true--the fight over the normal working day will continue to be a "protracted battle" between those who own the means of production and those who own really nothing more than their own labor power.

Return to top


Home l News & Letters Newspaper l Back issues l News and Letters Committees l Dialogues l Raya Dunayevskaya l Contact us l Search

Subscribe to News & Letters

Published by News and Letters Committees
Designed and maintained by  Internet Horizons