www.newsandletters.org












NEWS & LETTERS, March-April 2005

Eugenics today incarcerates 'less desirable'

by C.C. Simmons

The DALLAS MORNING NEWS published an editorial denouncing eugenics--genetic manipulation and selective breeding of the human race--and those who would practice it. Most often, eugenics appears as a government-sanctioned program that encourages procreation among only those who are deemed more socially acceptable, while discouraging or preventing breeding by the less desirable members of society.

The last large-scale, government-sanctioned experiment in eugenics began 70 years ago in Europe under the auspices of the Third Reich. Aryan women who bore Aryan sons were rewarded by the government with extra food and clothing. The non-Aryan members of the population were treated less well; many were surgically sterilized while others were consigned to the notorious work camps where it was unlikely they would reproduce and even less likely they would escape--ever.

GOVERNMENT-SPONSORED EUGENICS

Government-sponsored eugenics did not end with the fall of the Third Reich, however; it only became less obvious. Cleverly packaged with the popular tough-on-crime crusade, eugenics is now practiced by imprisoning those deemed less desirable. By using the criminal justice system to legitimize the selection and removal of undesirables, we have progressed from eugenics-in-theory to eugenics-in-practice.

More than two million adult men and women are currently imprisoned nationally. The ethnic mix of the nation's current prison population seems to reflect the private agenda and biases of eugenicists who seek to rid our population of undesirable members. If the present rate of incarceration remains unchanged, 6.6% of all U.S. residents born in 2001 will eventually go to prison--5.9% of whites, 17.2% of Hispanics and 32.2% of African-Americans.

To achieve this removal by socially and politically correct methods, eugenicists manipulate the criminal justice system in subtle--and not so subtle--ways. In Chicago, Prof. Larry Marshall, director of the Center on Wrongful Convictions, reported that Cook County prosecutors had a contest every week where they would look at who got convictions of African Americans and who had the biggest, heaviest African Americans. Whoever did would get free beer that Friday night when they went out to the bar.

In Tulia, Texas, undercover narcotics cop, Thomas Ronald Coleman, cruised poor Black neighborhoods in 1998 seeking to purchase drugs. In all, 38 people--35 of them Black--were convicted of selling small amounts of cocaine and sentenced to prison for up to 90 years. Every conviction relied solely on Coleman's testimony. Problem was, Coleman lied. In the investigation that followed, some defendants proved they were elsewhere when Coleman said he bought drugs from them. When the purity of the evidence was finally questioned, investigators speculated that Coleman had obtained a tiny amount of cocaine, then diluted it with a white substance to manufacture multiple bags of evidence.

State District Judge Ron Chapman found Coleman's testimony to be so unreliable that he recommended all 38 cases be overturned. In 2003, the 18-member Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles voted to recommend pardons for 35 of those convicted.

STERILIZATION OF PRISONERS

Selective imprisonment and manipulation of the criminal justice system are only two of the methods to curtail breeding by undesirables. Texas, for example, has borrowed a technique from the Third Reich and legitimized the surgical sterilization of criminals. As the DALLAS MORNING NEWS editorial correctly pointed out, the NAACP was right to sound the alarm about the use of genetics to control and improve society. Eugenics leads not to Utopia, said the editorial, but to Auschwitz.

Return to top


Home l News & Letters Newspaper l Back issues l News and Letters Committees l Dialogues l Raya Dunayevskaya l Contact us l Search

Subscribe to News & Letters

Published by News and Letters Committees
Designed and maintained by  Internet Horizons