www.newsandletters.org












NEWS & LETTERS, MAY 2003

Nationwide opposition to war on Iraq

New York

Over 100 protesters gathered in front of the New York offices of the Carlyle Group investment fund (of which George Bush senior is a member) in midtown Manhattan April 7, as part of a national day of direct action targeting war profiteers.  The action was barely attempted when police, outnumbering activists two to one, descended on the demonstrators. 

Several eyewitnesses who eyewitnesses had no intention of disobeying any laws, reported being penned into an area across the street.  Some were asked to disperse or be arrested, but many were not.  Some who claimed not to be doing anything other than standing on the sidewalk, observing, were taken in on the thinnest of pretenses.  All in all observers claimed over 100 arrests were made.

The outcome of the April 7 action contrasts sharply with the mood and success of a similar action that took place on March 27 in front of the GE building in Rockefeller Center, and shows what has changed in light of apparent news emanating from Baghdad this past week.  Along with violent measures, such as the rubber bullets and shock grenades used against protesters in Oakland demonstrations, such "pre-emptive strikes" and zero-tolerance policies on the part of the police seem to have as their target the momentum of the anti-war movement itself.

These tactics may continue, and become typical in the U.S., if the movement fails to strengthen itself by rethinking its tactics and its strategy, and broadening its message for the challenges that lay ahead as the U.S. threatens to intervene in other countries.

--Anti-war protester

* * *

West Lafayette, Ind.

Some students and local residents gathered together for a two-week campout on the "memorial mall" lawn at Purdue University recently, in protest of the war with Iraq. Chain-fasting, pamphlet distributing, drumming, and a wealth of conversation and fun pervaded the scene. The threats of violence, drunken insults of passers-by at all hours, and the rather disturbing amount of ignorance displayed by the many were not enough to break the spirit of the few who believed and continue to believe in a cause. The hope has remained that a much more just and humane world may come--one that is radically different than the vision of the Bush administration and the clutches of the invisible hand made visible with military force.

As a student concerned about the future of the world, I have been stunned by this experience which may be a microcosm of America. This representation of the greater whole both terrifies me and gives me hope. Dissent is unwanted as consent is produced and it seems that many Americans are simply willing to give, as someone angry at us protesters said, "absolute blind faith in my government." Obviously, "blind faith" is a problem in itself, but perhaps just as troubling is the use of the word "my" here. The fact that many seem to believe that the government is truly theirs and not that of the wealthy and privileged is disturbing.

On the other hand, there are some people out there (and they are everywhere) who believe in peace, true progress of humanity, and the fostering of mutually affirming relations with others in interpersonal and international relations. With Saddam gone, the potential of mutual affirming relations with the Iraqi people is there, that is, if this government was truly ours. But it is not, and the Iraqi people will continue their suffering, this time because of American and British brands of oppression.                          

--Purdue U. student

* * *

Flyer by the Marxist-Humanist Network at Purdue University

"Neither Bush Nor Saddam: For a Humanist World"

All too often one hears the anti-war movement characterized as "sympathetic to Saddam," as if protesters against this war were morally relativistic and absolutely blind to the nature of the Hussein regime.

All along, we Marxist-Humanists have condemned the Hussein regime for its crimes against humanity, yet do not believe that the current war is at all justified for many reasons. Specifically, we single out its genocidal use of poison gas against Iraq's Kurdish minority. This took place in 1988, at a time when Iraq was a quasi-ally of the U.S. Recently, as the regime crumbled, the Iraqi people have come out into the streets, attacking symbols of the dictatorship and revealing as never before the full story of its foul prisons and torture chambers. We support the aspirations of the Iraqi people to be free of all forms of oppression, whether from the Saddam Hussein regime, from other internal conservative forces such as religious fundamentalism, and from the attempt by the U.S. and Britain to incorporate Iraq into their version of globalized capitalism.

World opinion is against this U.S.-led invasion because the world sees that the current administration is driven by a desire for unchecked American power around the globe. The world sees that the Bush administration has taken to defining so-called threats to America under the guise of fighting terrorism and launching pre-emptive strikes, bringing terror in the form of "collateral damage" to innocent Iraqi civilians.    

The Bush administration has provided no viable evidence of a link between the Hussein regime and Al-Qaeda. In fact, they fabricated evidence and lied directly to the UN and the world. Colin Powell's presentation to the UN outlining the "threat" posed by Iraq contained British intelligence that had been plagarized, forged documents seeking to establish that Iraq had tried to buy uranium from Niger, and much other information that had been denounced by chief UN weapons inspector Hans Blix as untrue. Such supposed links between Hussein and Osama bin Laden contradict the reality of the relationship between Hussein and Islamic fundamentalism... 

 The claim that the Iraqi people will experience democracy and liberty is dubious and it seems contradictory to impose democracy from outside. Democracy is not forced, it is chosen.

--April 12, 2003

* * *

San Francisco Bay Area

Anti-war civil disobedience

[caption: Protesters block access to Chevron Texaco in San Ramon, Cal. on April 14 just before they were arrested en masse.]

Return to top


Home l News & Letters Newspaper l Back issues l News and Letters Committees l Dialogues l Raya Dunayevskaya l Contact us l Search

Subscribe to News & Letters

Published by News and Letters Committees
Designed and maintained by  Internet Horizons