www.newsandletters.org












NEWS & LETTERS, December 2002

Editorial Article

Bush's drive to war imperils U.S.

As the Bush administration gears up for its war against Iraq--made easier by the failure of the Democrats to pose any pole of opposition in the recent elections and by the unanimous vote of the UN Security Council that Iraq comply with U.S. demands--a dangerous chapter has opened in the effort to restrict civil rights and political liberties inside the U.S.

The rightward shift in national and international policies started with the election of George W. Bush in 2000, but was moderated somewhat by the Democrat-controlled Senate. That change is now moving into high gear following the Republican midterm election victories and control of the House and Senate.

The most threatening of the administration's offensives is the one against individual rights and privacy. First came the U.S. PATRIOT act, steamrolled through Congress following the September 11, 2001 attacks. Then came the recent enactment of the Department of Homeland Security legislation and the Total Information Awareness plan. With them, the legal foundation for a full-blown police state is emerging with dictatorial power centered in the hands of one person: President Bush, the eager puppet of corporate America and the Christian Right.

TOTALITARIAN GRAB FOR INFORMATION

Most ominous by far is the Total(itarian) Information Awareness plan that will enable the administration to track virtually every activity an individual engages in. This includes credit card and money purchases, telephone calls, computer activity (including email), medical records, travel by land, sea or air at home or abroad, home purchases and mortgage payments, financial deposits and withdrawals, Social Security data, investments, interest and dividend payments, organizational memberships, educational records, and any encounter with a national, state or local legal agency.

Under the PATRIOT act, immigrants were stripped of many rights, military tribunals with secret testimony and no appeal were created, and "enemies" were defined so broadly as to include virtually anyone who did anything to "harm" the economy and endanger security. This definition can include strikers, anti-war and anti-capitalist globalization demonstrators, boycott participants as well as political radicals who could be labeled "enemies" and made subject to arrest and incarceration.

The PATRIOT act could have been used against the locked-out longshoremen who halted West Coast shipping for two weeks last month, but Bush did not need to expose this power in the act so soon--plenty of time for that in the future--since he could use the repressive and more familiar Taft-Hartley slave labor act.

Another massive assault against organized labor will result from the unprecedented consolidation of 22 separate government agencies, with nearly 170,000 employees and a combined budget of more than $355 billion, under the Department of Homeland Security.

DEMOCRATS ROLL OVER

Bush's demand to exercise total control over the department, which will mean the abolition of union and civil service protections, had been delayed until the election, after which the Democrats capitulated to give Bush a free hand to implement his anti-labor agenda. While the FBI and CIA maintain their autonomy and are not included in the reorganization, a separate intelligence unit will be created in the new department.

At the same time, the administration announced its intention to permit private corporations to compete for as many as 850,000 government jobs--a clear signal of its pro-corporate, anti-labor perspective. This signal will not be missed by state and local governments, which will try to emulate this to eliminate or weaken their own unionized employees.

When Ronald Reagan took office in 1980, he telegraphed his anti-labor convictions by firing the unionized air traffic controllers who went on strike, and followed this with eight years of pro-business programs and policies. Compared with Bush, however, Reagan was a piker. The danger President Dwight Eisenhower warned about, the military-industrial complex, has been realized and confronts America in its most naked and rapacious form in the Bush administration.

Bush's total support of the military is reflected in the $354.8 billion approved for the military--the largest build-up in 20 years. Another request for $10 billion more to fund secret programs is certain to be added that will be used as seen fit by the Pentagon with no Congressional oversight or accountability.

WARS TO COME AT HOME AND ABROAD

Not included in this are the unknown expenses of a war against Iraq, which could run to $100 billion. Bush is determined to launch his war regardless of what Hussein does in response to UN inspections and in spite of worldwide opposition to unilateral U.S. military action.

Bush's ability to browbeat the Democrats into virtual silence on the issue of Iraq, on the grounds that any criticism of his policy represents a failure to oppose terrorism, will no doubt be used by him in the future to deflect opposition to his reactionary policies.

This situation makes it imperative for the forces opposed to war to make it clear that we oppose not only the Bush administration, but also reactionaries like Saddam Hussein and the terrorist threat posed by religious fundamentalism. Unless the anti-war movement openly addresses the continuing threat posed by forces like Al Qaeda, it will not be able to convince people in this country that Bush's policies are not geared to protect us.

Just as the administration failed to anticipate the attacks of September 11--in large part because it spent more time spying on domestic opponents than seriously pursuing Osama bin Laden--so the rulers cannot be entrusted with the job of protecting us from further terrorist attacks. The truth is that Bush's national security state is aimed not so much against overseas terrorists as against potential forces of opposition inside the U.S.

Despite the present grim outlook, forces are emerging to challenge the administration's plans. The revolutionary spirit of Blacks and women in America, tempered in mass actions to gain rights through both the Women's Liberation and Civil Rights movements, is sure to forcefully resist efforts to roll back the rights won with much determination. They will be allied with youth, whose natural idealism is reflected in their organizing to eliminate sweatshops, to protest the drive to war on Iraq, to support union drives, and to demonstrate against the drive for capitalist globalization.

Youth have also been in the forefront of environmental protection actions, which are sure to be assailed after the midterm elections as the administration moves to expand forest logging, reduce restrictions on utility industry pollution and permit oil drilling off the coast of Florida and in the Alaskan Arctic.

Most crucial will be the opposition to regimentation by labor. This is demonstrated in actions by workers against exploitation, unsafe conditions, the dehumanization of the production line and the betrayals by their labor bureaucracies. Worker responses to further oppression planned by the administration can possibly unleash their creative potentials to remove the chains of bondage planned for them.

SNOOPING NOT TAKEN LIGHTLY

In this process workers can develop the kind of thinking that will inspire them to go beyond what they are against to what they are for, which of necessity will include the elements for the creation of a new human society. Evidence of the fear and revulsion by the American people of police-state trappings was reflected in widespread opposition to the earlier effort to create a federal snoop force of postal employees and other government workers. This opposition quickly forced the administration to abandon its plan.

However, the Total Information Awareness Agency, appropriately headed by convicted criminal John Pointdexter who consistently lied to Congress about his activity in the illegal Iran-contra conspiracy, makes such crude and elementary surveillance unnecessary and obsolete.

In this regard, it should be noted, as Martin Luther King Jr. declared two generations ago, that "everything Hitler did was 'legal,' while everything the Hungarian freedom fighters did in 1956 [in combating Russian totalitarianism] was 'illegal.'" The Bush administration will try to justify its restrictions on privacy and civil rights by evoking the need for "law and order" in the war against terrorism, but we must not allow it to get away with its effort to subjugate our most basic rights and liberties.

Return to top


Home l News & Letters Newspaper l Back issues l News and Letters Committees l Dialogues l Raya Dunayevskaya l Contact us l Search

Subscribe to News & Letters

Published by News and Letters Committees
Designed and maintained by  Internet Horizons