www.newsandletters.org











Lead article
October 1999


Western powers stand by in face of Indonesia's genocide in East Timor


by Kevin Michaels

A history of more than 20 years of genocide against the people of East Timor has culminated in a frenzy of death and terror wholly sponsored and organized by the government and military of Indonesia. The world will not soon forget the horrifying reports of violence broadcast from East Timor's capital, Dili, in the wake of the Aug. 30 referendum on independence in which 78.5% of those voting indicated their desire to break free of the domination Indonesia has imposed since its 1975 invasion. The carnage was carried out by militias composed of members of the small minority of East Timorese who favored "autonomy" within Indonesia, as well as government-sponsored transmigrants from other parts of the archipelago nation and out-of-uniform members of the Indonesian army and police.

In the days immediately after the massacres of supporters of independence began, representatives of the National Council of Timorese Resistance (CNRT), the umbrella group of East Timorese political groups working for freedom for their country, appealed both to the United Nations and the countries of the West for immediate action to stop the bloodshed. Those powers, however, in keeping with their decades-old policy of subordinating the right to self-determination for East Timor to their respective strategic interests, refused to act. Hundreds of thousands were forced to flee their homes either to the mountainous interior of the country or across the border into what are effectively concentration camps in Indonesian West Timor. The number of those butchered outright in Dili and scores of villages across the island will not be known for some time.

The tragedy of this event is that by the time the referendum took place, it was already too late to prevent the slaughter that the militias had publicly announced as their intent to carry out in the event of a vote for independence. During the period that the attention of the world was focused on the Serbian government's attempt to forcibly expel the Albanian population of Kosova, the Indonesian military was implementing a plan for a final solution to its Timor problem.

While culpability for the massacres lies primarily with the Indonesian government and military, the United Nations' refusal to heed warnings from observers on the ground that systematic preparations for a massive wave of anti-independence violence were underway well in advance of the date the referendum was finally held indicts that institution as well as the Western governments who claim to have been caught unawares.

The government of the United States bears particular responsibility because of its history of arming and training the Indonesian military. The U.S. government facilitated General Suharto's rise to power after he led an apocalyptic purge of leftist peasants, students and intellectuals in the aftermath of what may have been a coup attempt on the part of the Indonesian Communist Party in 1965.

COUNTDOWN TO BLOODSHED

Indonesian acquiescence to a referendum on East Timor's future was a result of Suharto's forced retirement from office in the spring of 1998 by mass pressure from students, workers and the middle class. The thaw in Indonesian society which took place after his departure permitted unprecedented opposition to the authoritarian society he built to appear. The political ferment even allowed movement on the question of East Timor, a topic on which the Suharto regime had been inflexible since it crushed that country's fleeting period of independence after the collapse of Portuguese colonialism.

Suharto's successor, B.J. Habibie, seemed to grudgingly admit that holding on to East Timor was no longer worth the great expense it required and gave signs that he was willing to consider change. He consented to releasing Xanana Gusmao, the imprisoned leader of the East Timorese resistance movement, to supervised confinement in a house in Jakarta. He also relented to allowing what was termed a "popular consultation" on the future status of East Timor, subject to approval by the People's Consultative Assembly: "autonomy" within Indonesia or independence.

An agreement was signed between the Indonesian and Portuguese governments in May to arrange for the vote. Portugal, East Timor's former colonial power and the political entity recognized by the United Nations as still having legal authority over the territory, has long been plagued by a bad conscience over its failure to permit the decolonization process to take place after the Carnation Revolution of 1974. While Portugal regularly consults with the CNRT, it did not formally participate in the signing of the agreement.

Even before the signing took place, a highly organized effort to undermine it was underway. Sections of the military, which continues to play a strongly politicized role in Indonesian society, were sponsoring armed groups in East Timor to disrupt the process which was to lead up to the referendum. Militia attacks occurred all through the spring, including a vicious one on a church in the village of Liquica in April, in which 57 people were killed.

A report has surfaced that shortly after this massacre, Dennis Blair, a U.S admiral, met with General Wiranto, the commander of the Indonesian military, ostensibly to tell him to reign in the militias. Instead, Blair in effect promised Wiranto future U.S. military training of Indonesian troops.

Targets of the increasing militia harassment included international humanitarian aid groups and the United Nations Assistance Mission to East Timor (UNAMET), the body charged with the preparation for and supervision of the referendum.

The interference became so intense that the date of the vote was pushed back twice. That UNAMET had to rely on the Indonesian police and army, the forces ultimately responsible for the rising tide of violence, to provide security for the organizing of the referendum exposes the basic absurdity of the arrangement. The UN and the West did not exhibit the will to ensure that the referendum would take place in a secure environment and thus are complicit in its horrible outcome.

VOTE ENDS IN TERROR

The vote itself and the counting of ballots took place with a minimum of disturbances. It was the announcement of the outcome however-an overwhelming majority voted for complete independence-which provided the signal for the nightmare to begin. Gangs armed with machetes and homemade firearms exploded into unbelievable violence as the Indonesian police and army stood idly by. Anyone deemed to be a supporter of independence, no matter what age, was considered a target. No one was safe, including the clergy in this predominantly Catholic country. Bishop Carlos Ximenes Belo, who shared the 1996 Nobel Peace Prize with independence leader Jose Ramos Horta, fled to Portugal.

The inadequate UNAMET force was confined to its compound in Dili, in which as many East Timorese as could make it over the barbed wire sought refuge. The violence became so fierce that eventually UNAMET vacated the island completely, a move which marked a humiliating end to the referendum process.

While the few remaining journalists transmitted stories of the genocide to the outside world, the Indonesian government claimed it needed time and the imposition of martial law to gain control of the situation. The fact that East Timor was already one of the most heavily militarized places in Asia seemed to be lost. Journalist Allan Nairn's eyewitness reports of militias operating directly out of Indonesian military facilities exposes this patently false claim of the Indonesian government.

Just as the Indonesian government protested that it was powerless, the governments of the West sat on their hands as well. Australia, long a silent partner in the Indonesian occupation in the sense that it formally recognized the latter's claim to the territory, stated it was ready to intervene but declined to take unilateral action. The U.S. and Britain made the token effort of interrupting military relations but likewise refused to go further. The plea of Falintil, the small armed East Timorese resistance force, for immediate assistance went unheeded. It was only at the Asian Pacific Economic Council meeting in Auckland, New Zealand-during which the murderous terror still raged-that President Clinton convinced Indonesia to permit an outside force in to restore order.

Incredibly, the first token air drop of food to the refugees facing starvation in the countryside did not take place until Sept. 17. The first elements of the Australian-led peacekeeping force began arriving on Sept. 20.

THE PRESENT AND THE FUTURE

This horrific genocide has revealed that the "New Order"-Suharto's name for the bloody regime he constructed-lives on after his departure. Nothing less than the course of Indonesia's unfinished transition to democracy is now at stake. The small numbers of courageous Indonesian students and independent labor unionists who denounced the genocide-far outnumbered by the larger demonstrations of narrow nationalists-are now confronted with a military which has been humiliated by what it considers a foreign incursion into its territory.

How it and Megawati Sukarnoputri, daughter of Sukarno, Indonesia's first president, who is set to become leader of the government later this year will deal with the ongoing movements for freedom in Aceh and Irian Jaya remains to be seen. Megawati has consistently opposed self-determination for East Timor and criticized Habibie's decision to allow the referendum to take place. It is possible that her nationalism will dovetail with the interests of the leaders of the now-chastened military and result in a less, not more, democratic Indonesia for its millions of peasants and workers still attempting to emerge from Suharto's authoritarian legacy.

This situation represents a grave challenge to a country with a long and distinguished history of anti-colonial and popular struggles.

The carnage in East Timor however, did reveal that millions the world over stand in solidarity with the Timorese people. From Australian dockworkers and students to activists in the U.S., Britain and Canada, to virtually the entire population of Portugal; all showed their support for a free and independent East Timor. Hopefully it is not too early to say that with the resilience of the people of East Timor and the solidarity of their friends abroad, the free country that existed for such a brief time in 1975 can now be born anew.



CLICK HERE TO GO BACK TO CONTENTS PAGE

CLICK HERE TO SUBSCRIBE TO NEWS AND LETTERS




Home l News & Letters Newspaper l Back issues l News and Letters Committees l Dialogues l Raya Dunayevskaya l Contact us l Search

Subscribe to News & Letters

Published by News and Letters Committees
Designed and maintained by  Internet Horizons