|
Rents
up 18%
Bain Co-op hit by rent strike
By Ulli Diemer
Seven News, February 12, 1977
Faced with an 18% rent hike, a group of tenants at the Bain Avenue
Co-op apartments have declared a rent freeze, and are continuing
to pay their rents at the old rate. They say that low-income tenants
simply cannot afford the new rents, and that as many as 25 households
will have to move out if the increase stands.
The group, however, is acting in opposition to the Residents Council,
consisting of all residents of the Co-op, which passed the increases
in the fall and which voted down the idea of a freeze by 115 to
16 at a residents meeting, the largest in Bains history, in December.
Spokesmen for the Council criticize the group for saying they would
abide by the decision of the residents as a whole, and then going
ahead anyway when the vote went overwhelmingly against them. Council
representatives also charge that the freeze action jeopardizes Bains
chances of moving resident ownership of the project. Bain is currently
paying off a $6.5 million mortgage to Central Mortgage and Housing.
However, supporters of the freeze say that they cannot sacrifice
themselves to the idea of ownership when they are faced with immediate
economic hardship. Steve Oltuski, a supporter of the freeze, says
that ownership is meaningless if tenants cannot afford the high
rents necessary to remain living there.
The new rents are $193 for a one-bedroom. apartment, $253 for a
lower two-bedroom, and $266 for a lower three-bedroom. Uppers cost
an extra $20. The increase which brought them to this level is the
third at Bain in little over 2 years. Earlier increases averaged
21% and 10%.
Ironically, because it is non-profit housing, the co-op is not
covered by rent controls. About half the tenants at Bain are covered
by government rent supplements. But many low-income people dont
qualify for them. Organizers of the freeze are now calling for a
universal subsidy. On one of their leaflets, they demand that
no one – including students, wage earners, UIC or welfare recipients,
singles, married or common-law couples – be required to pay more
than 25% of their income in rent.
In this, they are supported by the Residents Council, which has
agreed to start pressuring the government to change its policies
in this regard. Says Alexandra Wilson, property manager and Council
spokesman: We dont agree on the tactics, thats all. If we
freeze the rents, wed have the force of three governments upon
us and we wouldnt win. She also says that 10 households at
most would be so hard hit by the increases they would have to move.
Meanwhile, the council has set up a committee to find a way to help
those hardest hit by the increases.
Supporters of the freeze maintain that through united action it
would be possible to hold off the government and keep rents where
they are. They point to a housing project in Montreal which battled
a similar rent hike and won.
Estimates of the amount of support for the rent freeze at Bain
vary. Linda Jain, one of the organizers, claims that 50 unsubsidized
units are involved, and that another 50 subsidized units support
it. However spokesmen for the Residents Council say that only 26
units paid at the old frozen rate on February 1st.
Similarly, Jain estimates that 50 people turned out to protest
the rent hike at a demonstration on February 1st at the Co-op offices,
while Peter Tabuns, an opponent of the freeze, says there were only
half that number.
No love lost between us and the city
Tabuns says that the freeze has already cost Bain $1000, which
it will have to make up with higher rents in the future.
He accuses the supporters of the freeze of taking money out
of everyone elses pocket. Tabuns also says that the City
of Toronto Non-Profit Housing Corporation is very happy
over what is happening. According to him, the Non-Profit Housing
Corporation would be only too happy to see the tenants fail in their
attempts to achieve ownership of the project Theres no love
lost between us and the City, he says. He is a strong supporter
of the idea of co-op ownership, although he admits that costs are
high at first. He compares it to buying a house: a high initial
cost, but costs wont rise at the same rate as market rents.
In the longer run, co-ops are cheaper than the private sector,
he says.
In contrast, Linda Jain says that although she was formerly a strong
supporter she personally is now sitting down and re-evaluating
co-ops. She wonders whether they can ever work while the financial
power structure of society remains as it is. Youve got tenants
fighting tenants, she says. The basic problem is that
there is always a landlord. In a co-op, your landlord is yourself.
She says she is now leaning to the concept of City ownership, with
tenants developing their power through a strong tenants association.
Tabuns, on the other hand, feels that co-ops with ownership give
residents more economic advantages and more power to mobilize and
he wants Bain to become one. He notes that some co-ops in the city
had no rent increases at all this year, while City-owned non-profit
projects face hikes of 5% to 18%.
Bankruptcy touch
The City of Toronto Non-Profit Housing Corporation has the
bankruptcy touch, he says. Tabuns cites the corporations
bungling of repairs at Bain last year, which helped to drive costs
up. He says that the corporation is so inept that it forgot to pay
Bains tax bill (to the City!) on time last year, with the result
that Bain had to pay a penalty. The corporation deposits rent cheques
from Bain in an account that pays no interest at all. And thanks
to being owned by the Non-Profit Housing Corporation, Bain is taxed
at a commercial rate by the City. If it were a resident-owned co-op,
it would be assessed as residential and have to pay $20,000 a year
less in taxes. To Tabuns and others who form the majority on the
Residents Council, co-operative ownership offers definite advantages
that make some short-term sacrifices worthwhile. They resent the
fact that a minority of residents is defying the will of the majority
of residents and in so doing is jeopardizing the entire project.
Supporters of the rent freeze, on the other hand, some of whom
are affiliated with the Wages for Housework group, see themselves
as victims of cutbacks in family allowances, unemployment insurance,
and welfare, of wage controls that dont control prices, and
constantly rising costs that are forever adding to their load of
work and worry. To them, a rent increase is a rent increase no matter
what its justification, no matter how it was set and approved, and
they have decided to fight it.
The result is the spectacle of residents fighting among themselves
while the City looks on. What will happen at Bain is unclear. But
it is clear that Bains history shows that the co-op approach is
not an easy solution to the housing problems that so many in the
city face.
Published in Seven
News, February 12, 1977
See also:
Bain
Co-op OK's evictions, February 26, 1977
Bain
Co-op meets Wages for Housework, Summer 1977
Ulli Diemer
Phone: 416-964-1511
|