Publisher: The Overthrow Cluster of the Livermore Action Group, Berkeley, USA Year Published: 1983 Pages: 16pp Price: $1.25 Dewey: 323.40973 Resource Type: Article Cx Number: CX6187
Howard Ryan maintains that consensus is wrong in principle and in practice: "The problem is not so much that individuals are being irresponsible or somehow abusing the consensus process. The problem lies in giving individuals that kind of power in the first place. Consensus turns majority rule into minority rule. That's not democracy."
Abstract: According to Ryan, "voting and consensus can both involve forms of coercion, i.e. forcing one party to accept the decision of another. The difference is that with voting the will of the majority holds sway, while under consensus an individual or minority wields the power through exercise of the block or veto. Consensus proponents have ignored how preventing people from doing as they wish can be no less coercive than forcing them to do as they do not wish. Also, there are often limited options available so that, when a person blocks, if the larger group wants to do anything at all it is forced to go the way of the blocker. It's worth noting that the block need not actually take place for this coercion to happen. People working together over time get to know where others in the organization stand and who is prepared to hold resolutely against certain types of decisions. In consensus groups, people frequently make concessions or agree to things they are not really comfortable with but realize the decision would otherwise be blocked and the group immobilized... There is a whole undercurrent of power plays and manipulations using consensus. Similar things go on with voting but there isn't that strong drive to cover up disagreement with a superficial unity. Nor does voting give individuals or small minorities the right to force their will on the larger group. Far from alleviatiating abuses of power or encouraging equality, consensus allows individuals to abuse power to no end."
See also: One Vote for Democracy http://www.diemer.ca/Docs/Diemer-OneVoteforDemocracy.htm
Connexions exists to support individuals and groups working for freedom and social justice. We work to maintain and make available a record of the theory and practice of people struggling against oppression and for social change. We believe that the more we know about the struggles, victories, and defeats of the past, and about those who took part in them, the better equipped we will be to bring a new world into being.
Connexions maintains a physical archive of books and documents, and is engaged in an ongoing project to build and expand an indexed digital archive of documents. We try to feature a wide variety of resources reflecting a diversity of viewpoints and approaches to social change within our overall mandate of support for democracy, civil liberties, freedom of expression, universal human rights, secularism, equality, economic justice, environmental responsibility, and the creation and preservation of community.
We are internationalist in our orientation, but as a Canadian-based project we feature an especially extensive collection of Canadian documents and profiles of Canadian activist organizations.
Some materials in Connexions are copyrighted by their authors or creators. Others are in the public domain or copyright Connexions. Materials for which Connexions holds the copyright are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution - Non-commercial - No Derivative Works 2.5 Canada License. Indexing and search applications are by Ulli Diemer, Chris DeFreitas, and Henri Nzounkeu.