Seymour Hersh Blasts Media for Uncritically Promoting Russian Hacking Story
Publisher: The Intercept
Date Written: 25/01/2017
Year Published: 2017
Resource Type: Article
Cx Number: CX20430
Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Seymour Hersh said in an interview that he does not believe the U.S. intelligence community proved its case that President Vladimir Putin directed a hacking campaign aimed at securing the election of Donald Trump. He blasted news organizations for lazily broadcasting the assertions of U.S. intelligence officials as established facts.
According to the report, the NSA was said to have had a lower confidence level than James Clapper and the CIA about the conclusion that Russia intended to influence the election. Hersh characterized the report as full of assertions and thin on evidence.
"It's high camp stuff," Hersh told The Intercept. "What does an assessment mean? It's not a national intelligence estimate. If you had a real estimate, you would have five or six dissents. One time they said 17 agencies all agreed. Oh really? The Coast Guard and the Air Force -- they all agreed on it? And it was outrageous and nobody did that story. An assessment is simply an opinion. If they had a fact, theyd give it to you. An assessment is just that. It's a belief. And they've done it many times."